Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4734 13
Original file (NR4734 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 8. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR4734-13
10 Jun i4

 

‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

9 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable

statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dtd 20 Mar 14,

a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Boardé found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
réconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Rnd SS, FOS

ROBERT D. “2SALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: HQOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dtd 20 Mar 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6114 14

    Original file (NR6114 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary materia considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6114-14 a correction of an official naval he applicant to demonstrate the existence of Consequently, when applying for record, the burden is on t probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14

    Original file (NR6707 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13

    Original file (NR8674 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14

    Original file (NR0529 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. In addition, the Board on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00028-09

    Original file (00028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 Jume 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05689 11

    Original file (05689 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 5000 RFF-DOSS02 dated 21 Jun 12 and HOMC Memo 1650 MMMA-3 dated 13 Oct 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09297-04

    Original file (09297-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. We have been requested to provide an advisory opinion on application requesting payment of accrued leave prior to his General Courts Martial.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7264 14

    Original file (NR7264 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 pIc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of annual leave. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12643 14

    Original file (NR12643 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR12643-14 17 Mar 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Gn eee. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10712 14

    Original file (NR10712 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM). NR10712-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,...